Food labelling regulations are not just about compliance; they are vital for building consumer trust. In fact, more than 30 countries are set to implement or propose warning labels for products high in sugar, fat, or sodium by 2025. But here’s the twist—most food manufacturers are still underestimating the impact of these changes. As consumer demands for transparency rise, simply following the rules won’t cut it. Companies must adapt to not only meet regulations but also to exceed consumer expectations, fostering loyalty and enhancing brand reputation.
| Takeaway | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Understanding Global Regulations is Crucial | Food producers must adapt their labelling practices to meet diverse regulatory requirements across different markets as food labelling regulations vary significantly worldwide, impacting compliance and consumer trust. |
| Ingredient and Allergen Transparency is Expected | Consumers increasingly demand clear ingredient lists and allergen information, requiring food manufacturers to provide compliant, detailed disclosures to enhance consumer safety and trust. |
| Emerging Trends Indicate a Shift Towards Simplicity | The introduction of front-of-package nutrition labelling and warning labels for unhealthy products are crucial developments that can influence consumer choices and encourage healthier product reformulation. |
| Digital Solutions Provide Adaptability | Integrating digital features like QR codes can enhance the information provided on labels, offering transparency and flexibility, especially for meeting varied regional labelling requirements. |
| Sustainability Information is Becoming Essential | As consumer interest in environmental impact grows, incorporating sustainability metrics into labelling may become crucial for maintaining competitiveness and meeting evolving consumer expectations. |
Navigating the complex landscape of food labelling regulations is essential for manufacturers, retailers, and anyone involved in the food supply chain. These regulations exist to protect consumers, ensure food safety, and provide clear information about what people are consuming.
Food labelling regulations vary significantly across different regions and countries, despite ongoing efforts toward global harmonization. The lack of uniformity means that food producers must adapt their labelling practices to meet the specific requirements of each market they serve.
More than 30 countries worldwide have either implemented or proposed warning labels for products high in sugar, fat, or sodium by 2025, according to Sessions UK. This trend reflects growing concern about the link between diet and non-communicable diseases.
Major regulatory bodies that govern food labelling include:
The European Union maintains some of the strictest food labelling regulations globally, requiring detailed ingredient lists and comprehensive allergen disclosures for all prepackaged foods, as noted by Sessions UK.
While specific requirements differ across jurisdictions, most food labelling regulations address several core elements:
“Regional approaches to labelling can help address public health priorities, but harmonization in standards remains a long-term challenge for global food trade,” explains Yiannas Yiannis, Former Deputy Commissioner for Food Policy and Response at the U.S. FDA.
Food labelling regulations continue to evolve, with several notable trends shaping the landscape for 2025 and beyond.
Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labelling is gaining momentum globally. The U.S. FDA proposed a new front-of-package nutrition labelling scheme in January 2025 to help consumers make faster and healthier food choices, according to the FDA. This scheme will cover most packaged foods, representing a significant push toward simplifying nutrition information for consumers.
Similarly, countries like Indonesia are planning to launch Nutri-Grade labelling systems in 2025, which will grade products based on their nutritional profiles.
Another emerging trend involves more precise expiry date labelling. Japan, for instance, is refining its approach, moving away from generic best-before statements toward more precise information to enhance consumer clarity.
“Updating labelling standards enables regulators to provide better information for consumers and encourages manufacturers to reformulate products for healthier profiles,” notes Dr. Amandine Garde, Professor of Law at the University of Liverpool and expert in food marketing and public health law.
Understanding and complying with these evolving regulations is not just about legal compliance—it’s about building consumer trust and demonstrating a commitment to transparency in an increasingly health-conscious market.
When it comes to labelling for food products, ingredient lists and allergen claims are among the most critical elements. They serve not only as legal requirements but as vital information that can directly impact consumer health and safety.
The ingredient list on a food label must detail every substance used in the product’s manufacture. While this might seem straightforward, there are specific rules that must be followed:
“The trend toward full ingredient transparency reflects growing recognition that consumers want to know exactly what’s in their food,” explains Dr. Mary Story, Professor at the Department of Global Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “This is no longer just a regulatory burden but a consumer expectation.”
Allergen disclosure is one area where regulations are particularly strict and the consequences of non-compliance can be severe. Different regions handle allergen declarations slightly differently, but the intent is the same: to clearly alert consumers to the presence of substances that could cause allergic reactions.
In most jurisdictions, food manufacturers must highlight the presence of common allergens either in the ingredient list or in a separate “Contains” statement. The major allergens that typically require declaration include:
Allergen declarations must be clear and conspicuous. Simply including an allergen in the ingredient list is often not enough—many regulations require that allergens be emphasized through bold text, italics, different colours, or other means that make them stand out.
Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) addresses potential cross-contamination risks. Statements like “May contain traces of nuts” or “Manufactured in a facility that also processes wheat” fall under this category.
While PAL is not mandatory in many regions, it’s become an important practice for manufacturers to protect both consumers and themselves. However, overuse of these statements can limit food choices for allergy sufferers and reduce their effectiveness.
“Precautionary allergen labelling should be based on thorough risk assessment, not used as a blanket protection for manufacturers,” notes Dr. Amandine Garde from the University of Liverpool. “When overused, these warnings lose meaning and can unnecessarily restrict food choices for people with allergies.”
“Free-from” claims such as “gluten-free,” “dairy-free,” or “nut-free” are increasingly common but are subject to strict regulations. These claims can only be made when products genuinely do not contain the specified substance at levels that would trigger reactions in sensitive individuals.
For example, “gluten-free” products must typically contain less than 20 parts per million (ppm) of gluten. Simply having a low amount isn’t sufficient—the product must meet the established thresholds.
Verification processes for free-from claims often include:
These claims aren’t just marketing tools—they’re promises to consumers with specific dietary needs or health concerns. Making false or misleading free-from claims can lead to serious regulatory penalties and, more importantly, pose significant health risks to consumers.
According to Sessions UK, a common misconception is that food labelling rules are uniform worldwide. However, requirements for ingredient disclosure and allergen warnings continue to vary between regions, making it essential for food manufacturers to understand the specific regulations in each market they serve.
As we move through 2025, the transparency of ingredient lists and accuracy of allergen claims will remain central to both regulatory compliance and consumer trust in the food industry.
The design and layout of food product labels go far beyond mere aesthetics—they directly impact consumer understanding, regulatory compliance, and purchasing decisions. A well-designed label communicates essential information clearly while maintaining brand identity and shelf appeal.
Food packaging labels must strike a delicate balance between providing all required information and maintaining visual appeal. A cluttered, text-heavy label might contain all necessary details but fails if consumers find it overwhelming or difficult to read.
Production line managers and product development engineers should consider these fundamental principles when designing labels:
“The trend toward front-of-package nutrition labelling reflects growing recognition that easy-to-understand labels can influence healthier consumer choices,” notes Dr. Mary Story, Professor at the Department of Global Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This underscores the importance of not just including information, but presenting it effectively.
The technical aspects of label typography directly impact legibility and compliance. Most regulatory frameworks specify minimum requirements for text size and visibility:
Production line managers should note that different printing technologies may affect how text appears on various packaging materials. Always check printed samples rather than digital proofs to verify readability.
Placement of information on food labels isn’t arbitrary—it follows both logical hierarchy and regulatory requirements. While specific rules vary by region, these general principles apply:
The U.S. FDA’s proposed front-of-package nutrition labelling scheme in 2025 will cover most packaged foods, representing a significant push toward simplifying nutrition information for consumers, according to the FDA. This trend toward prominent nutritional information is changing how key elements are positioned on packaging.
Colour and visual elements serve as powerful tools on food labels, helping consumers quickly identify key information:
According to Sessions UK, over 30 countries are expected to implement or propose warning label policies on products high in sugar, fat, or sodium by 2025. Many of these systems rely heavily on visual cues like colour coding and symbols to convey information quickly.
For production line managers and operations staff, practical aspects of label implementation are just as important as design principles:
“Food manufacturers and exporters must monitor and comply with shifting regional labelling regulations to access global markets and avoid costly recalls,” emphasizes Reach24H. This makes adaptable, well-planned design systems essential for companies selling across multiple markets.
By approaching label design strategically, food producers can ensure regulatory compliance while creating packaging that effectively communicates with consumers and maintains brand identity—ultimately supporting both safety and sales.
The food labelling landscape is continuously evolving as consumer preferences shift, technology advances, and regulatory frameworks adapt. Understanding these emerging trends is essential for food industry professionals looking to stay ahead of the curve.
One of the most significant developments in food labelling is the global movement toward standardized front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labelling systems. These systems aim to provide consumers with simplified nutritional information that can be quickly understood while shopping.
The U.S. FDA proposed a new front-of-package nutrition labelling scheme in January 2025 to help consumers make faster and healthier food choices, according to the FDA. This scheme will cover most packaged foods, representing a sweeping push for simplicity in nutrition information.
Similarly, Indonesia is planning to launch its Nutri-Grade labelling in 2025, which will grade products based on their nutritional profiles, as reported by Sessions UK. These systems typically use colour-coding, letter grades, or symbols to indicate a product’s overall nutritional quality at a glance.
Front-of-package labelling isn’t just informational—it’s increasingly becoming an influential factor in product reformulation. When nutritional qualities are prominently displayed, manufacturers have greater incentive to improve their products’ nutritional profiles.
Beyond informative nutrition labels, more than 30 countries globally have either implemented or proposed warning labels specifically for products high in sugar, fat, or sodium by 2025, according to Sessions UK.
These warning labels often take the form of black octagons (as used in Chile), triangles (as in Brazil), or other high-visibility symbols placed prominently on packaging. The intent is to provide an immediate visual cue to consumers about potentially unhealthy products.
For food industry professionals, these warning labels represent both a challenge and an opportunity. While they may initially impact sales of some products, they also create incentives for product innovation and reformulation to avoid negative labelling.
Digital technology is revolutionizing how consumers interact with food labels. QR codes, near-field communication (NFC) tags, and augmented reality features are increasingly being incorporated into food packaging to provide expanded information beyond what fits on a physical label.
These digital extensions allow manufacturers to share:
For production managers, these technologies offer flexibility to adapt information without changing physical packaging, which can be particularly valuable when selling across multiple markets with different labelling requirements.
Environmental impact information is becoming increasingly important on food labels. Consumers are demanding transparency not just about what’s in their food, but about how it was produced and its environmental footprint.
Sustainability labelling trends include:
While few of these disclosures are currently mandatory, many food companies are voluntarily adding environmental impact information to meet consumer demand for sustainable products. As environmental concerns continue to grow, we may see more standardized approaches to sustainability labelling in the coming years.
Expiry date labelling is becoming more precise and nuanced as food waste concerns grow. Japan, for instance, is refining its approach to expiry date labelling, moving from generic best-before statements to more precise information for consumer clarity, as noted by Sessions UK.
The traditional “best before” and “use by” dichotomy is expanding to include more specific guidance about:
This trend responds to growing awareness of food waste issues and aims to help consumers make better-informed decisions about when food is truly no longer safe or desirable to eat.
“Regional approaches to labelling can help address public health priorities, but harmonization in standards remains a long-term challenge for global food trade,” explains Yiannas Yiannis, Former Deputy Commissioner for Food Policy and Response at the U.S. FDA.
This observation highlights one of the key challenges in food labelling today. While global harmonization would simplify compliance for international food companies, regional and national governments continue to develop labelling approaches tailored to their specific public health priorities and consumer preferences.
China, for example, will release revised standards for prepackaged food labelling (GB 7718 and GB 28050) in 2025, updating requirements for both domestic and imported food products, according to Reach24H.
For food industry professionals, staying informed about these evolving trends and regional differences is essential for maintaining compliance and meeting consumer expectations in an increasingly complex global marketplace.
Food labelling requirements by 2025 will include the implementation of warning labels on products high in sugar, fat, or sodium in more than 30 countries, as well as a move towards front-of-package nutrition labelling to help consumers make healthier choices.
Food manufacturers can ensure compliance with allergen regulations by clearly highlighting allergens in the ingredient list or through a separate ‘Contains’ statement, and by following specific guidelines for precautionary allergen labelling to inform consumers of potential cross-contamination risks.
Digital and smart packaging, such as QR codes, allows for detailed information sharing, including sourcing, preparation, and sustainability, providing flexibility for manufacturers to update information without changing physical labels while enhancing consumer trust.
Sustainability information is becoming essential as consumers increasingly demand transparency regarding the environmental impact of their food, including carbon footprint, water usage, and packaging recyclability, which influences their purchasing decisions.
As food labelling regulations evolve rapidly in anticipation of 2025, it’s crucial to stay ahead of the curve. Are you prepared to meet the new demands for transparency, accuracy, and compliance? Errors in labelling can lead to costly recalls and tarnish your brand’s reputation. With more than 30 countries implementing new warning labels on products high in sugar, fat, or sodium, the time to act is now.
At Sessions UK, we specialise in helping businesses like yours streamline their packaging operations with reliable labelling solutions tailored to your specific needs. Whether you’re a small artisan producer aiming for professional shelf appeal or a large-scale manufacturer requiring high-speed accuracy, our range of labelling machines has you covered:
Don’t let compliance and consumer demands jeopardise your success. Visit Sessions UK today and discover our innovative solutions that enhance productivity, build consumer trust, and keep you ahead of regulatory changes!
Copyright © 2025 Sessions Label Solutions Ltd.