Automated labelling is reshaping production lines across industries. It enhances both consistency and speed, allowing operations to label products at rates often exceeding thousands of items per hour. But here’s the twist: many businesses still rely on manual methods despite these impressive statistics. The truth is, moving to automation can unlock not just higher efficiency, but also significant cost savings and error reduction. Discover how the future of labelling can transform your operations.
| Takeaway | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Automated labelling enhances consistency and speed | Automated labelling systems can significantly increase the accuracy and throughput of labelling processes, leading to fewer errors and faster production rates compared to manual methods. |
| Thorough assessment of production requirements is essential | Understanding specific production volume, product variety, and industry regulations is crucial when selecting the right labelling tool for optimal performance and compliance. |
| Implement a phased approach to integration | Transitioning from manual to automated labelling should be done gradually, allowing for testing and adaptation of the new technology while minimising operational disruptions. |
| Focus on continuous improvement and training | Regularly collect performance data and invest in comprehensive training for operators to maximise system efficiency and adapt to evolving production needs. |
| Address common challenges proactively | Anticipating issues such as material compatibility, data management, and integration with legacy systems can help ensure smooth implementation and ongoing operational success. |
Automated labelling represents a significant shift in how businesses handle product identification, tracking, and compliance. At its core, automated labelling uses technology to replace manual labelling processes, bringing consistency, speed, and accuracy to what was traditionally a labour-intensive task.
Labelling automation refers to the systematic process of applying labels to products, packages, or components using mechanical or digital systems with minimal human intervention. This technology spans from simple label applicators to sophisticated vision-guided systems that can identify, orient, and apply labels precisely.
The concept extends beyond merely sticking labels on products. Modern automated labelling encompasses:
Research indicates that AI-powered automation in data labelling can reduce annotation time by up to 70%, significantly accelerating development while ensuring consistent high-quality annotations across industrial applications, according to Labellerr’s industry analysis.
Understanding the fundamentals requires familiarity with the key components that make up most automated labelling solutions:
Label Applicators: These mechanical devices apply pre-printed or print-and-apply labels to products. They range from simple pneumatic applicators to complex robotic systems capable of applying labels at various angles and positions.
Printing Mechanisms: On-demand printing technologies like thermal transfer, direct thermal, inkjet, or laser printing create labels with variable data like batch numbers, expiration dates, or serialised tracking codes.
Vision Systems: Cameras and sensors verify correct product orientation, ensure accurate label placement, and conduct quality checks to confirm label readability.
Control Software: The brain of the operation, this software coordinates the entire process, manages data input/output, and often integrates with enterprise resource planning (ERP) or manufacturing execution systems (MES).
The shift toward automated labelling isn’t merely a technological trend—it addresses fundamental business challenges. Operations managers and production line supervisors are increasingly turning to automation because it delivers tangible advantages:
Consistency is perhaps the most immediate benefit. When labels are applied by machines rather than humans, placement precision becomes remarkably consistent. This consistency is crucial for barcode scanning, regulatory compliance, and brand presentation.
Speed represents another compelling advantage. Automated systems can label products at rates far exceeding manual processes—often hundreds or thousands of items per hour. For pharmaceutical production managers or those overseeing high-volume manufacturing, this throughput is invaluable.
Error reduction stands as a critical driver of automation adoption. The cost of labelling errors extends beyond wasted materials—it can trigger recalls, compliance violations, or supply chain disruptions. As research on automated data labelling points out, accuracy issues follow the “garbage-in, garbage-out” principle, making quality control essential.
Labour allocation improves significantly with automation. Rather than assigning workers to repetitive labelling tasks, businesses can redeploy staff to higher-value activities requiring human judgment and creativity.
The journey from manual labelling to full automation typically follows an evolutionary path rather than a revolutionary one. Understanding this progression helps operations managers and business owners identify their current position and plan their next steps.
Many businesses begin with semi-automated solutions—perhaps a tabletop label printer with manual application—before advancing to integrated systems. This gradual approach allows for testing the concept, building confidence, and developing internal expertise before larger investments.
The most sophisticated automated labelling systems now incorporate machine learning and AI capabilities, enabling them to adapt to changing product characteristics or improve performance over time. These systems represent the cutting edge of what’s possible in production environments where consistency and traceability are non-negotiable requirements.
Selecting the appropriate automated labelling tool for your operation is a decision that can significantly impact productivity, quality control, and return on investment. With numerous options available, making an informed choice requires careful consideration of several crucial factors that align with your specific business needs.
Before evaluating specific tools, gain clarity on your production requirements. The right tool for a pharmaceutical production line will differ markedly from what works best in a food packaging facility.
Start by examining your production volume and speed. High-volume operations typically require robust, industrial-grade labelling systems that can maintain consistent performance under demanding conditions. For smaller operations or those with variable production runs, flexibility might take precedence over raw speed.
Product variety is another critical consideration. If your production line handles diverse products with different shapes, sizes, and labelling requirements, you’ll need a system with quick changeover capabilities and versatile applicator options. Conversely, operations that focus on standardised products might benefit from more specialised equipment optimised for a narrower range of applications.
Labelling requirements themselves vary tremendously across industries. A procurement officer in pharmaceuticals must ensure that labelling tools meet strict regulatory compliance standards, while a food packaging operation might prioritise variable data printing for batch codes and expiration dates.
When comparing labelling tools, several features deserve particular attention:
Precision and Repeatability: The system should consistently apply labels in the exact same position, especially critical for products requiring machine readability or compliance with specific standards.
Integration Capabilities: Modern production environments require seamless data flow between systems. Look for tools that can integrate with your existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, manufacturing execution systems (MES), or warehouse management systems (WMS).
Adaptability to Data Types: Research indicates that certain automated labelling algorithms perform better with specific datasets. According to a comprehensive study from Chalmers University, practitioners should evaluate how many labeled samples are needed to achieve the highest accuracy for their specific use case before selecting a tool. This is particularly relevant for operations handling complex or variable data.
Maintenance Requirements: Consider the regular maintenance needs, availability of spare parts, and the level of technical expertise required to keep the system operational. Systems with simpler maintenance regimens often deliver better long-term value despite potentially higher initial costs.
Scalability: As your business grows, can the labelling system grow with you? Look for modular systems that allow for capacity expansion or feature upgrades without requiring complete replacement.
The underlying technology of your labelling system significantly impacts its capabilities and suitability for your operation.
Print technology choices include thermal transfer, direct thermal, inkjet, and laser printing. Each offers different advantages in terms of durability, resolution, and variable data capabilities. For instance, thermal transfer excels in environments requiring durable, high-contrast labels, while inkjet systems might offer greater flexibility for certain applications.
Application methods vary widely, from tamp applicators for flat surfaces to blow applicators for delicate products and wrap systems for cylindrical items. The nature of your products will largely dictate which application method is most appropriate.
Intelligent features are increasingly important in modern labelling systems. Vision systems that verify label placement, barcode readers that validate code quality, and predictive maintenance capabilities can significantly enhance operational efficiency.
For procurement officers and business owners, understanding the complete cost picture extends beyond the initial purchase price. A thorough total cost of ownership analysis should include:
An often-overlooked consideration is the learning curve associated with implementing new technology. Research on active learning techniques suggests that uncertainty sampling—selecting data points for which the model is least certain—can reduce the amount of labeled data required while maintaining model performance. This means systems that incorporate such intelligent sampling approaches may offer faster implementation and training periods.
Before committing to a labelling system, conduct thorough testing with your actual products and labels. Many suppliers offer testing services or demonstration units that allow you to evaluate performance under conditions that mirror your production environment.
Request references from existing users, particularly those in similar industries or with comparable applications. Their experiences can provide valuable insights into real-world performance, reliability, and supplier support quality.
By methodically evaluating these factors against your specific needs, you can select an automated labelling tool that not only meets your current requirements but positions your operation for future growth and adaptation to changing market demands.
Transitioning from manual to automated labelling represents a significant operational shift that requires careful planning and execution. While the benefits are substantial, successful implementation depends on a structured approach that addresses both technical and organisational considerations.
Before installing any equipment, develop a comprehensive implementation strategy that addresses short and long-term objectives. According to experts at Freyr Solutions, organisations should define clear objectives and conduct a thorough assessment of current processes before proceeding with automation.
Start by documenting your existing labelling process in detail. This baseline assessment should identify current bottlenecks, error rates, labour requirements, and throughput metrics. These measurements will not only guide your implementation but also provide comparison points to evaluate success after deployment.
Set specific, measurable goals for what you expect from automation. These might include:
With goals established, create a realistic timeline that accounts for equipment delivery, installation, testing, operator training, and the gradual transition from manual to automated processes.
Successful implementation requires buy-in from various stakeholders across the organisation. Engage departments like regulatory affairs, quality assurance, and marketing early in the process to ensure cross-functional alignment. This collaborative approach helps identify potential challenges and secures the support needed for a smooth transition.
Operator training deserves particular attention. Even the most sophisticated automated labelling system requires knowledgeable operators to maintain optimal performance. Develop comprehensive training programmes that cover:
Consider designating “power users” who receive advanced training and can serve as internal experts to support their colleagues during the transition period.
The physical integration of automated labelling equipment into your production line requires careful planning to minimise disruption. Work closely with your equipment supplier to:
The technical setup extends beyond physical installation to include system configuration and integration with existing software systems. This often involves:
Before transitioning to full production, implement a comprehensive testing protocol to validate system performance under various conditions. This should include:
Performance Testing: Verify that the system meets specified speed and accuracy targets across your full product range.
Error Handling: Test how the system responds to various error conditions, such as label jams, print failures, or data transmission issues.
Integration Testing: Confirm that data flows correctly between your automated labelling system and other production systems.
Quality Verification: Establish procedures to regularly verify label quality, placement accuracy, and barcode readability.
Research shows that AI-powered automation in data labelling can reduce annotation time by up to 70% while maintaining high-quality results, according to industry analysis. However, these benefits only materialise with proper testing and validation protocols in place.
Rather than switching entirely from manual to automated labelling overnight, consider a phased implementation approach that gradually increases the role of automation. This might involve:
This measured approach minimises production risks and allows team members to build confidence with the new technology progressively.
Implementation isn’t complete after the initial setup—it’s an ongoing process of refinement. Establish a continuous improvement framework that leverages machine learning techniques such as active learning and semi-supervised learning. These approaches allow systems to improve over time from human input, enhancing accuracy while reducing manual effort, as noted by automation experts.
Regularly collect performance data and feedback from operators to identify opportunities for optimisation. Schedule periodic reviews to assess whether the system is meeting established goals and to adjust parameters as needed.
By approaching implementation as a structured, phased process with clear goals and ongoing evaluation, you can maximise the benefits of automated labelling while minimising disruption to your operations.
Even with careful planning and implementation, automated labelling processes can encounter various challenges that impact efficiency, accuracy, and compliance. Understanding these common obstacles—and how to address them—can help production managers and operations teams maintain optimal performance.
One of the most frequent challenges involves compatibility between labels, adhesives, and product surfaces. Labels that work perfectly on glass bottles might fail on plastic containers or irregularly shaped items.
To overcome this challenge:
Remember that label material selection isn’t just about adhesion—it also affects print quality, durability, and regulatory compliance. For pharmaceutical applications in particular, label integrity throughout the product lifecycle is non-negotiable.
Modern production often requires incorporating variable data—batch numbers, expiration dates, serialisation codes, or custom information—on each label. Managing this data flow presents several challenges:
A robust data management strategy should include:
According to research from AI Multiple, data quality management is critical for successful automated labelling implementation, as accuracy depends entirely on the quality of sample datasets—following the “garbage-in, garbage-out” principle. To overcome this challenge, teams must invest extra effort in preparing high-quality standard datasets through efficient processes.
Production managers often face pressure to maximise throughput while maintaining label quality—a balancing act that becomes more challenging as production speeds increase.
Addressing this challenge requires:
Rather than viewing this as a simple trade-off, successful operations develop a nuanced approach that optimises both factors based on product requirements.
Many manufacturing facilities operate with a mix of new and legacy equipment, making seamless integration of automated labelling systems challenging.
To overcome integration hurdles:
Experts at Sessions UK recommend identifying solutions that integrate with existing systems rather than completely replacing functional infrastructure. This approach minimises disruption while still delivering automation benefits.
As industries adopt smart labels with NFC and RFID technology, new production challenges emerge. According to Packaging Technology Today, these technologies present unique demands in industries like pharmaceuticals, requiring precise inlay placement and specialized protection during conversion processes.
Addressing these challenges involves:
Regulatory requirements present ongoing challenges, particularly in highly regulated industries like pharmaceuticals, food, and chemicals.
Best practices for maintaining compliance include:
For pharmaceutical production managers, compliance isn’t optional—it’s essential for maintaining product legality in the marketplace.
The human element remains critical even in automated systems. Resistance to change, knowledge gaps, or improper operation can undermine even the most sophisticated technology.
Strategies for addressing human factors include:
By anticipating these common challenges and implementing thoughtful mitigation strategies, operations teams can navigate the transition to automated labelling more smoothly and realise the full benefits of their investment.
Automated labelling refers to the process of applying labels to products using mechanical or digital systems with minimal human intervention, enhancing speed, consistency, and accuracy in production.
The key benefits include increased operational speed, improved label accuracy, reduced labour costs, enhanced consistency, and lower error rates, which can lead to significant cost savings and better compliance.
To select the right labelling tool, assess your production volume, product variety, and specific industry regulations. Evaluate features like precision, integration capabilities, and adaptability to your data types.
Develop a comprehensive implementation strategy that includes planning, stakeholder engagement, proper training of operators, physical integration, thorough testing, and a phased rollout approach to minimise disruption.
As highlighted in our recent article on starting with automated labelling, the future of your production line hinges on accuracy, speed, and efficiency. The challenges of manual labelling—from errors that could cost your business dearly to the struggle of maintaining consistency—are all too real. But there’s hope! With Sessions UK’s expert labelling solutions, you can elevate your operations and embrace the revolution in labelling technology.
!
Our fit-for-purpose machines are designed with your unique requirements in mind, whether you’re an operations manager striving for seamless integration, a small business owner longing for compact solutions, or a pharmaceutical compliance officer prioritising accuracy above all else. Don’t let outdated methods hold you back any longer. Explore our “Explore by Application” tool on Sessions UK to find the perfect labelling machine for your needs. Take the first step towards automation NOW and experience the difference that precision technology can make for your brand!
Copyright © 2025 Sessions Label Solutions Ltd.